Wexner Calls Epstein 'Con Man' in House Testimony

Is Congress fulfilling its duty to investigate a high-profile Epstein associate or does Wexner deserve more scrutiny than a one-time deposition?

Published 9 hours ago

Wexner Calls Epstein 'Con Man' in House Testimony

story

Above: Democratic lawmakers speak to the press after deposing Leslie Wexner in New Albany, Ohio, on Feb. 18. Image credit: Dustin Franz/Bloomberg/Getty Images

The Spin

Pro-establishment narrative

The House Oversight Committee fulfilled its duty by securing six hours of sworn testimony from Wexner and pressing him on his long ties to Jeffrey Epstein. Lawmakers confronted inconsistencies and public skepticism head on. Though critics found his answers lacking, Wexner did not refuse questions and says he wants to help. If he follows through, investigators may still gain valuable insight into Epstein's crimes.

The New York Times New York Post

Establishment-critical narrative

This deposition underscored how implausible Wexner's claims are. After giving Epstein sweeping financial control and vast assets, he now says he recalls little and knew nothing, despite FBI scrutiny and Epstein's own references to shared "gang stuff." That, coupled with accusers' descriptions of abuse on his properties guarded by security, calls for more than just a deposition. He should not be allowed to dodge accountability after decades of enabling men like Epstein.

ZeroHedge

Evan's Substack on Substack