© 2026 Improve the News Foundation.
All rights reserved.
Version 7.0.0
Threatening war while demanding sweeping, arguably unattainable concessions risks repeating the catastrophic miscalculations that paved the way for the Iraq invasion. Military buildup without a coherent legal rationale or credible post-conflict planning invites another destabilizing Middle East crisis with unpredictable regional fallout. A sustainable diplomatic path remains possible if Washington moves away from maximalist ultimatums and acknowledges Iran’s right under international frameworks to pursue peaceful nuclear energy within verifiable limits.
Maximum pressure works. Expanding sanctions on Iran’s shadow fleet, financial channels, and missile networks — reinforced by visible, credible, and sustained military deterrence — rebuilds the leverage necessary to prevent the regime from acquiring nuclear weapons. Consistent enforcement signals resolve and limits Tehran’s room for maneuver. Diplomacy carries weight only when backed by strength, and Iran’s leadership must understand that continued defiance will invite escalating and decisive consequences rather than incremental concessions.