© 2026 Improve the News Foundation.
All rights reserved.
Version 7.6.4
Baghdad is backing its disarmament ultimatum with real consequences: any weapons outside state control after Sept. 30 will face legal action, while anti-corruption raids have already netted dozens of officials ahead of the prime minister's U.S. visit. Some of the most powerful Iran-aligned factions have also pledged to hand over weapons and integrate into state institutions, marking an early test of Baghdad's authority.
Iraq's disarmament deadline is almost certainly a political performance, not a genuine shift in power. Militia commanders who trade uniforms for government titles while still answering to Tehran have not disarmed — they have simply rebranded. Headquarters remain open, flags stay up, patronage networks keep operating, and the armed structures shaping Iraq's security landscape continue to hum along. Washington should demand verifiable action.
Iraq's disarmament deadline looks less like a sovereign security decision than another concession extracted under U.S. pressure ahead of the prime minister's Washington trip. Demanding that forces which helped defeat IS disarm while foreign troops remain on Iraqi soil risks weakening Iraq's deterrence. As long as Washington shapes Baghdad's security agenda, Iraq's monopoly on force remains constrained rather than restored.