DC Grand Juries Decline to Indict Trump Threat Cases

story

1 day ago

Above: U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro at the White House on Sept. 2, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Image copyright: Alex Wong/Getty Images

story last updated 1 day ago

The Spin

Democratic narrative

Trump's rampant weaponization of the justice system — deploying federal agents for minor infractions, overcharging dissenters and jailing critics on flimsy grounds — has eroded trust in prosecutions. Grand juries, which typically indict easily, are now rejecting absurd cases, like threats against Trump or sandwich-throwing at agents. This pushback is a reasonable reaction to Trump's authoritarian overreach.

The New York Times The New Republic

Republican narrative

Grand juries refusing to indict Jones and Dana for threatening Trump’s life reveal a broken system, not a justified stand against overreach. Clear intent, like Jones’ cross-state threats and Dana’s admitted intent, demands accountability, and failure to do so reveals a politicized jury system . D.C.'s juries, desensitized by crime, are blocking justice, and residents welcome Trump’s crackdown to restore order to their neighborhoods.

FOX News American Thinker