Lockdown Files: Hancock Threatened to Block Disability Funding, Pressured Lawmakers

Lockdown Files: Hancock Threatened to Block Disability Funding, Pressured Lawmakers
Image credit: WPA/Getty Images [via The Guardian]

The Facts

  • Former UK Health Sec. Matt Hancock supported pressuring a Conservative Minister of Parliament, James Daly, if he failed to vote to implement the government's COVID tier system, leaked WhatsApp messages have revealed. The exchange specifically suggests Hancock backed plans to threaten to block funding for a disability center in Daly's constituency.
  • Shortly ahead of a Dec. 1, 2020 vote, Hancock apparently sided with his political aide's proposition that a planned learning disability hub in Greater Manchester should be "off the table" until Daly backed the government. A separate WhatsApp message included a list of 95 Conservative Ministers of Parliament who intended to oppose the tier system and their related concerns.
  • An official spokesperson for current Conservative Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has said that, although they "can't speak for the actions of a former government," it was not the sort of behavior the premier would want in his cabinet, adding that "funding decisions are taken in line with strict guidelines."

Sources Split


The Spin


Right narrative

The news keeps getting worse for Matt Hancock. After it emerged that he mocked those "locked up" in hotel rooms because of COVID guidance — and even that the science itself was based on concern for political image rather than the advice of public health experts — it seems that he was also complicit in a disgraceful Westminster culture of pressuring lawmakers. It's unclear whether Hancock's public career can withstand The Lockdown Files.

Left narrative

The Lockdown Files are embarrassing and chaotic, but the fallout from the decision to leak WhatsApp messages from the heart of government during an unprecedented public health disaster risks doing serious damage to democracy. It was inevitable that tensions would arise during COVID, and that many professionals would simply have to attempt to do the right thing in the situation — even if they weren't sure what that would be. Disclosing the minutiae of these exchanges and retrospectively scrutinizing those involved will do nothing to encourage the free debate needed to uphold UK democracy.

© 2026 Improve the News Foundation. All rights reserved.Version 7.17.0

© 2026 Improve the News Foundation.

All rights reserved.

Version 7.17.0