Controversy
The Royal Society
arXiv
Technology Networks
PLOS
Jim Jansen
Status:Open

Will AI Influence the Integrity of the Scientific Publication Process?

UNLIKELYLIKELY

Claims

PLOS
PLOS AI "will never replace a person’s expertise and judgement [in scientific publishing]."Sep 18, 2025
Technology Networks
Technology Networks "Over-reliance on AI could reduce the role of critical human judgment in scientific inquiry, potentially overlooking novel or unconventional insights that AI algorithms might miss."Apr 24, 2024
Jim Jansen
Jim Jansen"AI has the potential to be an assistive tool in peer review — supporting summarization, drafting, and literature searches. But a fully AI-driven review is unacceptable."Sep 15, 2025
WJMH
WJMH"AI can ensure greater consistency and precision of a manuscript and provide a faster, streamlined workflow and an enhanced automated publication process."Sep 22, 2025
ACS Publications
ACS Publications"Using a small number and diversity of AI systems for scientific production has the potential to amplify the scale of biases, propagating them efficiently on a global level and avoiding the mechanism of individual scrutiny often used to identify these biases."Sep 22, 2025
ScienceDirect
ScienceDirect "The future of scholarly writing will not be about rejecting AI, but about writing with it—critically, creatively, and self-consciously."Sep 23, 2025
NCBI
NCBI"AI will expedite the peer-review process, offering critical insights to define and uphold rigorous publication standards."Apr 29, 2001
Michael J. Black
Michael J. Black "This [AI] is not a great accelerator for science or even a helpful tool for science writing. It is potentially distorting and dangerous for science."Sep 23, 2025
arXiv
arXiv"This lack of scrutiny [in AI scientist systems] poses a risk of introducing flaws that could undermine the integrity, reliability, and trustworthiness of their research outputs."Sep 10, 2025
The Royal Society
The Royal Society"Using AI to estimate the quality of articles and predict citation counts also risks amplifying biases, putting authors from under-represented disciplines, institutions, or regions at a disadvantage."Sep 15, 2023
WJMH
WJMH"AI can streamline the peer review process in publishing by identifying suitable reviewers and flagging potential conflicts of interest."Sep 22, 2025
NCBI
NCBI"AI will create new avenues to refine the editorial process [that] are poised to drive the evolution of scholarly publishing."Apr 29, 2001
PublishingState
PublishingState"Artificial intelligence is already deeply embedded in the machinery of scientific publishing and its presence is only going to grow."Jul 19, 2025
Elsevier
Elsevier "The future of scientific publishing and peer review will likely include more AI-powered tools."Sep 15, 2025
Amy Brand
Amy Brand"I myself remain optimistic that, with careful planning and evidence-based policy, we will use AI to improve peer review, enhance reproducibility, and streamline publishing workflows and costs."Sep 23, 2025




© 2025 Improve the News Foundation. All rights reserved.Version 6.16.0

© 2025 Improve the News Foundation.

All rights reserved.

Version 6.16.0