UN Backs Replacing Mercator With New World Map

Does the Equal Earth map projection correct centuries of distortion of Africa or politicize a cartographic choice with Its own trade-offs?
UN Backs Replacing Mercator With New World Map
Above: Map (by Lucas Fielding) shows a Mercator projection of the world, 1817. Image credit: Buyenlarge/Getty Images

The Spin


Pro-establishment narrative

Scrapping the Mercator projection risks turning a cartographic choice into a political statement. Every flat map distorts the globe, and Mercator remains useful because it preserves angles and directions, especially for navigation. Equal Earth represents land area more accurately but introduces other distortions. Governments and schools should teach the strengths and limits of different projections rather than declaring one map unacceptable and replacing it by decree.

Establishment-critical narrative

Replacing the Mercator projection is a long-overdue correction to a centuries-old distortion that makes Africa appear smaller than it really is. Maps shape how generations understand the world, and using a projection that exaggerates northern landmasses reinforces an outdated view of Africa's place in it. A U.N. vote for a more accurate representation is a meaningful step toward putting global geography — and Africa's true scale — back into perspective.


Metaculus Prediction


Public Figures

© 2026 Improve the News Foundation. All rights reserved.Version 7.13.0

© 2026 Improve the News Foundation.

All rights reserved.

Version 7.13.0