Study: Smacking Children Linked to Worse GCSEs and Bullying

Does this demand a ban on smacking children or does the research fall short of making the case?
Study: Smacking Children Linked to Worse GCSEs and Bullying
Image credit: Unsplash

The Facts

  • A recent University College London (UCL) study published Thursday has found that children in England who were physically punished at ages 3, 5 and 7 were 5.7 percentage points more likely to fail to achieve five GCSE passes, including English and math, compared with those who had not experienced it.
  • The UCL research, funded by the Nuffield Foundation and supported by the NSPCC, is the first to use U.K. data to examine the impact of physical punishment on children. Previous studies drew primarily on data from the United States.
  • Adolescents aged 14 who had experienced physical punishment between ages 3 and 7 were found to be 33% more likely to engage in risky behaviors toward others, including being 41% more likely to bully siblings and 26% more likely to engage in cyberbullying.

Sources Split


The Spin


Narrative A

Smacking a child is an act of violence that leads to real, measurable harm — worse GCSE results, more bullying and riskier behavior well into the teen years. UCL's research is clear: physical punishment has zero benefits and England and Northern Ireland are falling behind by keeping it legal. Seventy countries have already banned it, and Scotland and Wales show reform works.

Narrative B

Splashy headlines about smacking and GCSEs deserve serious scrutiny before driving major policy changes. The study was purely observational, built on questionnaire responses from families — hardly the ironclad foundation needed to justify criminalizing parenting decisions. Big claims demand big, rigorous data, and this research simply doesn't clear that bar.

© 2026 Improve the News Foundation. All rights reserved.Version 7.17.1

© 2026 Improve the News Foundation.

All rights reserved.

Version 7.17.1