Musk Drops Apple From Antitrust Suit

Did dropping Apple expose a flimsy antitrust crusade or is the iOS-ChatGPT deal exactly what the Sherman Act exists to stop?
Musk Drops Apple From Antitrust Suit
Above: Elon Musk at a meeting in Beijing, China on May 14. Image credit: Johannes Neudecker/picture alliance/Getty Images

The Facts

  • Elon Musk's X Corp and SpaceXAI said Monday they resolved their claims against Apple in an antitrust lawsuit alleging the iPhone maker conspired with OpenAI to monopolize markets for smartphones and generative AI chatbots.
  • In a filing in federal court in Texas, the companies moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) to dismiss their claims against Apple with prejudice, meaning they cannot be refiled. Apple did not oppose the motion.
  • U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman granted the motion Monday while leaving intact the claims against OpenAI. The filing did not explain the reason for the dismissal or disclose whether a settlement had been reached.

Sources Split


The Spin


Narrative A

Dropping Apple from the case says everything about how flimsy this antitrust crusade always was. Grok itself topped the App Store charts, as did DeepSeek and Perplexity, which shreds the whole preferential treatment theory. The OpenAI fight looks just as shaky, with his earlier lawsuit getting thrown out this May. Lawfare is exactly the right word for Musk's strategy

Narrative B

A smartphone gatekeeper with 65% market share cutting an exclusive deal with the chatbot leader holding over 80% is exactly the kind of arrangement the Sherman Act exists to stop. Baking ChatGPT into iOS hands one company billions of Siri prompts while rivals starve for data. Self-preferencing sank Google Shopping in Europe, and the same logic applies here.


Public Figures


The Controversies



Go Deeper

© 2026 Improve the News Foundation. All rights reserved.Version 7.18.3

© 2026 Improve the News Foundation.

All rights reserved.

Version 7.18.3