Flock Safety Tightens Privacy Rules

Is Flock a vital crime-fighting tool or an unaccountable surveillance dragnet ripe for abuse?
Flock Safety Tightens Privacy Rules
Above: A Flock license plate reader and camera in Pleasant Hill, California, on April 16. Image credit: Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images

The Facts

  • Flock Safety announced Thursday that a criminal case number will be required before conducting searches by year's end for all police forces. This comes in light of privacy concerns regarding the AI security camera system, including reports of law enforcement misuse.
  • Flock is also making its Audit Assistance tool mandatory for all customers, which flags abnormal search behavior for review and suspends use of the system. About a third of agencies had used it voluntarily.
  • Flock, whose automated license plate readers are used by over 6,000 U.S. law enforcement agencies, is reducing data retention from 30 days to seven for data not tied to a case number. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said this exceeds their recommended 48-hour limit.

Sources Split


The Spin


Narrative A

Flock cameras track every driver, every day, whether or not anyone did anything wrong, turning ordinary trips into government surveillance data. Deputies and police chiefs have abused these databases to stalk exes, track women seeking abortion care and harass innocent people. This is a dragnet that cannot be reformed, only rejected.

Narrative B

Flock never gets credit for the missing persons found or crimes solved, something the system is amazingly powerful at. Social media misinformation necessitates the company clarifying what this game-changing technology actually does. Flock doesn't own the data collected and most law enforcement agencies use the technology responsibly. Flock is an invaluable law enforcement tool.

© 2026 Improve the News Foundation. All rights reserved.Version 7.17.1

© 2026 Improve the News Foundation.

All rights reserved.

Version 7.17.1