Pakistan, Afghanistan Meet in China For Peace Talks

Is Pakistan justified in demanding TTP action before peace talks or must it halt airstrikes first?
Pakistan, Afghanistan Meet in China For Peace Talks
Above: Afghan men armed with guns and rifles march to show their solidarity with Taliban personnel while shouting slogans against Pakistan, in the Zazai Maidan district of Khost province on March 27. Image credit: AFP/Getty Images

The Spin


Narrative A

Pakistan's demand for verifiable action against the TTP remains a reasonable baseline for any credible peace process, especially as Kabul continues to deny militant sanctuaries on its soil. That refusal narrows the space for meaningful diplomacy. China's mediation is a genuine effort to ease tensions, but talks in Urumqi are unlikely to succeed without clear, enforceable Afghan commitments, leaving Pakistan with little incentive to compromise further.

Narrative B

Pakistan launched airstrikes deep into Afghanistan that killed civilians, then labeled the resulting Afghan response "unprovoked" — that's not a peace posture but aggression framed in diplomatic language. Exploratory talks in Urumqi are a start, yet Pakistan’s military-first approach undermines its credibility at the table. Genuine de-escalation would require Islamabad to halt strikes first, rather than setting conditions from a position of force.


Metaculus Prediction


Public Figures


Go Deeper

© 2026 Improve the News Foundation. All rights reserved.Version 7.2.2

© 2026 Improve the News Foundation.

All rights reserved.

Version 7.2.2