The New York Times spent five months fabricating a conflict of interest story, pivoting between baseless accusations after each was debunked. Every allegation — from invented dinners with tech CEOs to nonexistent promises of presidential access — collapsed under scrutiny. This represents a willful mischaracterization of facts to support a predetermined narrative rather than honest journalism.
David Sacks wields extraordinary power over artificial intelligence policy while maintaining 449 investments in A.I.-related companies that directly benefit from his decisions. His ethics waivers obscure the true scope of conflicts by misclassifying A.I. companies as generic software firms, while his policies have generated billions for Nvidia and positioned his own portfolio companies for massive gains. The White House A.I. czar is in cahoots with Silicon Valley to profit from the very industry he regulates.
© 2025 Improve the News Foundation.
All rights reserved.
Version 6.18.1