SCOTUS Weighs Arguments Between Art, Theft in Warhol Case

SCOTUS Weighs Arguments Between Art, Theft in Warhol Case
Image credit: artnewspaper

The Facts

  • SCOTUS will hear arguments Wednesday surrounding a copyright dispute between the late artist Andy Warhol's estate and celebrity photographer Lynn Goldsmith over paintings that are based on a 1981 photograph she took of the rock star Prince.
  • Goldsmith has claimed that Warhol's silkscreen image of Prince was based too closely on her photograph, whereas Warhol's foundation has argued the artwork falls under the fair use doctrine.
  • The Second Circuit federal appeals court rejected the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts' fair use claim. The court ruled Warhol's works failed all four of the required fair use tests under US copyright law.

Sources Split


The Spin


Narrative A

Warhol's use of the image was fair use, and although Goldsmith has a reason to be frustrated, her litigation is going too far. This case threatens to diminish an established doctrine that allows artists the right to creative expression by building on established works in a reasonable manner.

Narrative B

Warhol’s work shouldn't be able to compete with Goldsmith’s original photo in the marketplace, and she had a right to share in the license of any of Warhol’s works that used hers as inspiration. There has been too much devaluing of artists, particularly photographers, by social media. Print media shouldn’t be contributing to this problem.

© 2026 Improve the News Foundation. All rights reserved.Version 7.18.2

© 2026 Improve the News Foundation.

All rights reserved.

Version 7.18.2