Canada: Carney, Smith Sign Pipeline Deal; Guilbeault Quits

Is this pipeline agreement a dangerous distraction from viable projects, or a balanced path to energy leadership?
Canada: Carney, Smith Sign Pipeline Deal; Guilbeault Quits
Above: Mark Carney and Danielle Smith (L) in Calgary on Nov. 27, 2025. Image credit: Rajan Sawhney via X

The Spin

Government-critical narrative

The pipeline deal is a dangerous distraction from real projects that actually create jobs and revenue right now. Renegotiating federal climate policies province by province will trigger a race to the bottom, increase emissions, and create investment uncertainty. No private buyers exist for this phantom pipeline, which lacks a clear route and adequate Indigenous support, and faces an immovable tanker ban on the north coast.

Pro-government narrative

This transformational energy agreement balances environmental responsibility with economic growth through industrial carbon pricing at $130 per tonne and a 75% methane reduction target. The pathway to an Asian pipeline enhances Canada's energy independence, but requires the Pathways Alliance carbon capture project as a prerequisite. This nuanced approach positions Canada as a global energy leader.


Articles on this story



© 2025 Improve the News Foundation. All rights reserved.Version 6.18.1

© 2025 Improve the News Foundation.

All rights reserved.

Version 6.18.1